MENU_MAIN/博客/AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

There once was an AI named Chat who was really good at repeating back information it already knew. One day, Chat was given to some office workers [1] to help them with their jobs. Some of the workers were experts at their jobs, while others were still learning.

At first, Chat helped all the workers get more work done faster - even the experts! But soon, the experts noticed something funny. The workers who were still learning got way MORE help from Chat. The new workers improved a lot using Chat, doing their work faster and better than ever before!

The experts wondered why Chat didn't help them as much. That's when they realized - that Chat is an expert at repeating back facts but can't come up with brand new ideas. So, for workers who already knew those facts, Chat didn't offer them that much new help. But for newer workers still learning those basics, Chat was able to teach them so much more!

This shows a correlation - as in, two things that relate to each other and change together. The more expert a worker already was, the less helpful Chat was for them. But for newer workers, Chat could help them almost as much as the experts! It's because of their different starting points. Chat has a limit to how expert it can be. So, the closer a worker already was to Chat's expertise, the less new stuff Chat offered them.

The experts and newbies improved at different rates thanks to Chat. Their own expertise compared to Chat's matters for how much more they can learn. That connection in how much they improve is the correlation!

The SDTEST^® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.

Imagine also giving an "A.I. and the end of civilization" poll. It asks people to rate at the agree or disagree level.

Now imagine 100 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST^® colors with their rated answers about the danger of AI.

Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!

Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the danger of AI. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.

Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “A.I. and the end of civilization“. The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.

人工智能和文明的終結

Charts 相关性

VUCA

Revealed_statistically_significant_correlation

正態分佈，威廉·西莉·格塞特（William Sealy Gosset）（學生） r = 8.41

非正態分佈，Spearman r = 0.36

僅顯示結果 > r = 8.41

投票問題

所有問題

1) 安全（您同意或不同意多少？）

2) 控制（您同意或不同意多少？）

分配

Positive,%

Negative,%

普通的

2.2 Answer 1 4.7 Answer 2 1.5 Answer 3 3.8 Answer 4 #1	-7 Answer 9 -1 Answer 9 -3.3 Answer 10 #1
3.3 Answer 5 3 Answer 6 1 Answer 7 7.4 Answer 8 #2	-7.3 Answer 11 -0.7 Answer 5 -5.3 Answer 12 #2

普通的

2.5 Answer 10 4.9 Answer 3 2.3 Answer 4 #1	-5.6 Answer 1 -0.5 Answer 9 -1.4 Answer 9 -2.3 Answer 2 #1
2.6 Answer 5 4.3 Answer 12 9.1 Answer 7 5.2 Answer 8 #2	-10.5 Answer 11 -2.9 Answer 5 -1.2 Answer 6 #2

普通的

2 Answer 1 1.2 Answer 9 1.6 Answer 10 1.5 Answer 3 1 Answer 4 #1	-0.7 Answer 9 -6 Answer 2 #1
9.4 Answer 5 0.4 Answer 8 #2	-2.3 Answer 11 -3.1 Answer 5 -6.8 Answer 12 -1 Answer 7 #2

普通的

5.6 Answer 9 1.7 Answer 10 8.3 Answer 3 #1	-12.4 Answer 1 -1.6 Answer 2 -4 Answer 4 #1
7.2 Answer 11 5.4 Answer 12 2.6 Answer 7 #2	-0.5 Answer 5 -1.8 Answer 5 -3.9 Answer 6 -10.3 Answer 8 #2

普通的

10.8 Answer 1 4.1 Answer 9 2.5 Answer 2 #1	-0.3 Answer 9 -2.8 Answer 10 -9.6 Answer 3 -4.2 Answer 4 #1
7.8 Answer 11 0.6 Answer 6 3 Answer 12 #2	-3.9 Answer 5 -2.4 Answer 5 -0.7 Answer 7 -5.2 Answer 8 #2

普通的

2.2 Answer 9 2.9 Answer 2 7.1 Answer 4 #1	-2 Answer 1 -3.4 Answer 9 -1.9 Answer 10 -5.3 Answer 3 #1
4.3 Answer 11 0.3 Answer 6 3.5 Answer 12 5 Answer 8 #2	-4.8 Answer 5 -2.6 Answer 5 -4 Answer 7 #2

普通的

7.8 Answer 1 2.9 Answer 9 0.8 Answer 2 0.7 Answer 10 #1	-0.8 Answer 9 -4.8 Answer 3 -5.7 Answer 4 #1
2.6 Answer 11 2.5 Answer 5 4.7 Answer 5 1.9 Answer 6 #2	-5.1 Answer 12 -10.8 Answer 7 -1 Answer 8 #2

export_to_excel

win_buy_vuca_message

好的

[1] https://www.ft.com/content/b2928076-5c52-43e9-8872-08fda2aa2fcf

2023.11.27

Valerii Kosenko

產品主SaaS Pet ProjectSDTEST®

Valerii於1993年獲得社會教育學家的資格，此後已將其知識應用於項目管理。
Valerii在2013年獲得了碩士學位和項目和計劃經理資格。在他的碩士課程中，他熟悉Project Roadmap（GPM Deutsche GesellschaftFürProjektmanagemente。V.）和螺旋動力學。
Valerii進行了各種螺旋動力測試，並利用他的知識和經驗來適應當前版本的SDTest。
Valerii是探索V.U.C.A.的不確定性的作者。使用螺旋動力學和心理學中的數學統計數據，有20多個國際民意測驗的概念。

這個帖子有 0 評論

取消答复

發表評論