Mathematical Psychology

This project investigates mathematical psychology's historical and philosophical foundations to clarify its distinguishing characteristics and relationships to adjacent fields. Through gathering primary sources, histories, and interviews with researchers, author Prof. Colin Allen - University of Pittsburgh [1, 2, 3] and his students Osman Attah, Brendan Fleig-Goldstein, Mara McGuire, and Dzintra Ullis have identified three central questions:

What makes the use of mathematics in mathematical psychology reasonably effective, in contrast to other sciences like physics-inspired mathematical biology or symbolic cognitive science?
How does the mathematical approach in mathematical psychology differ from other branches of psychology, like psychophysics and psychometrics?
What is the appropriate relationship of mathematical psychology to cognitive science, given diverging perspectives on aligning with this field?

Preliminary findings emphasize data-driven modeling, skepticism of cognitive science alignments, and early reliance on computation. They will further probe the interplay with cognitive neuroscience and contrast rational-analysis approaches. By elucidating the motivating perspectives and objectives of different eras in mathematical psychology's development, they aim to understand its past and inform constructive dialogue on its philosophical foundations and future directions. This project intends to provide a conceptual roadmap for the field through integrated history and philosophy of science.

The Project: Integrating History and Philosophy of Mathematical Psychology

This project aims to integrate historical and philosophical perspectives to elucidate the foundations of mathematical psychology. As Norwood Hanson stated, history without philosophy is blind, while philosophy without history is empty. The goal is to find a middle ground between the contextual focus of history and the conceptual focus of philosophy.

The team acknowledges that all historical accounts are imperfect, but some can provide valuable insights. The history of mathematical psychology is difficult to tell without centering on the influential Stanford group. Tracing academic lineages and key events includes part of the picture, but more context is needed to fully understand the field's development.

The project draws on diverse sources, including research interviews, retrospective articles, formal histories, and online materials. More interviews and research will further flesh out the historical and philosophical foundations. While incomplete, the current analysis aims to identify important themes, contrasts, and questions that shaped mathematical psychology's evolution. Ultimately, the goal is an integrated historical and conceptual roadmap to inform contemporary perspectives on the field's identity and future directions.

The Rise of Mathematical Psychology

The history of efforts to mathematize psychology traces back to the quantitative imperative stemming from the Galilean scientific revolution. This imprinted the notion that proper science requires mathematics, leading to "physics envy" in other disciplines like psychology.

Many early psychologists argued psychology needed to become mathematical to be scientific. However, mathematizing psychology faced complications absent in the physical sciences. Objects in psychology were not readily present as quantifiable, provoking heated debates on whether psychometric and psychophysical measurements were meaningful.

Nonetheless, the desire to develop mathematical psychology persisted. Different approaches grappled with determining the appropriate role of mathematics in relation to psychological experiments and data. For example, Herbart favored starting with mathematics to ensure accuracy, while Fechner insisted experiments must come first to ground mathematics.

Tensions remain between data-driven versus theory-driven mathematization of psychology. Contemporary perspectives range from psychometric and psychophysical stances that foreground data to measurement-theoretical and computational approaches that emphasize formal models.

Elucidating how psychologists negotiated to apply mathematical methods to an apparently resistant subject matter helps reveal the evolving role and place of mathematics in psychology. This historical interplay shaped the emergence of mathematical psychology as a field.

The Distinctive Mathematical Approach of Mathematical Psychology

What sets mathematical psychology apart from other branches of psychology in its use of mathematics?

Several key aspects stand out:

Advocating quantitative methods broadly. Mathematical psychology emerged partly to push psychology to embrace quantitative modeling and mathematics beyond basic statistics.
Drawing from diverse mathematical tools. With greater training in mathematics, mathematical psychologists utilize more advanced and varied mathematical techniques like topology and differential geometry.
Linking models and experiments. Mathematical psychologists emphasize tightly connecting experimental design and statistical analysis, with experiments created to test specific models.
Favoring theoretical models. Mathematical psychology incorporates "pure" mathematical results and prefers analytic, hand-fitted models over data-driven computer models.
Seeking general, cumulative theory. Unlike just describing data, mathematical psychology aspires to abstract, general theory supported across experiments, cumulative progress in models, and mathematical insight into psychological mechanisms.

So while not unique to mathematical psychology, these key elements help characterize how its use of mathematics diverges from adjacent fields like psychophysics and psychometrics. Mathematical psychology carved out an identity embracing quantitative methods but also theoretical depth and broad generalization.

Situating Mathematical Psychology Relative to Cognitive Science

What is the appropriate perspective on mathematical psychology's relationship to cognitive psychology and cognitive science? While connected historically and conceptually, essential distinctions exist.

Mathematical psychology draws from diverse disciplines that are also influential in cognitive science, like computer science, psychology, linguistics, and neuroscience. However, mathematical psychology appears more skeptical of alignments with cognitive science.

For example, cognitive science prominently adopted the computer as a model of the human mind, while mathematical psychology focused more narrowly on computers as modeling tools.

Additionally, mathematical psychology seems to take a more critical stance towards purely simulation-based modeling in cognitive science, instead emphasizing iterative modeling tightly linked to experimentation.

Overall, mathematical psychology exhibits significant overlap with cognitive science but strongly asserts its distinct mathematical orientation and modeling perspectives. Elucidating this complex relationship remains an ongoing project, but preliminary analysis suggests mathematical psychology intentionally diverged from cognitive science in its formative development.

This establishes mathematical psychology's separate identity while retaining connections to adjacent disciplines at the intersection of mathematics, psychology, and computation.

Looking Ahead: Open Questions and Future Research

This historical and conceptual analysis of mathematical psychology's foundations has illuminated key themes, contrasts, and questions that shaped the field's development. Further research can build on these preliminary findings.

Additional work is needed to flesh out the fuller intellectual, social, and political context driving the evolution of mathematical psychology. Examining the influences and reactions of key figures will provide a richer picture.

Ongoing investigation can probe whether the identified tensions and contrasts represent historical artifacts or still animate contemporary debates. Do mathematical psychologists today grapple with similar questions on the role of mathematics and modeling?

Further analysis should also elucidate the nature of the purported bidirectional relationship between modeling and experimentation in mathematical psychology. As well, clarifying the diversity of perspectives on goals like generality, abstraction, and cumulative theory-building would be valuable.

Finally, this research aims to spur discussion on philosophical issues such as realism, pluralism, and progress in mathematical psychology models. Is the accuracy and truth value of models an important consideration or mainly beside the point? And where is the field headed - towards greater verisimilitude or an indefinite balancing of complexity and abstraction?

By spurring reflection on this conceptual foundation, this historical and integrative analysis hopes to provide a roadmap to inform constructive dialogue on mathematical psychology's identity and future trajectory.

The SDTEST^®

The SDTEST^® is a simple and fun tool to uncover our unique motivational values that use mathematical psychology of varying complexity.

The SDTEST^® helps us better understand ourselves and others on this lifelong path of self-discovery.

Here are reports of polls which SDTEST^® makes:

1) Soňky aýda işgärler bilen baglanyşykly kompaniýalaryň hereketleri (hawa / ýok)

2) Soňky aýda işgärler bilen baglanyşykly kompaniýalaryň hereketleri (% -de fakt)

3) Gorkuz

4) Meniň ýurduma ýüzbe-ýüz bolýan iň uly meseleler

5) Üstünlikli toparlary guranyňyzda haýsy häsiýetleri we başarnyklary ulanýarlar?

6) Google. Toparyň netijeliligine täsir edýän faktorlar

7) Iş gözleýänleriň esasy ileri tutulýan ugurlary

8) Bosbiýa uly lider näme edýär?

9) Adamlary işde üstünlik gazanýan näme edýär?

10) Uzakdan işlemek üçin az aýlyk almaga taýynmy?

11) Ageaşizm barmy?

12) Karýeradaky ýaşizm

13) Durmuşda ýaşizm

14) Ageaşylygyň sebäpleri

15) Adamlaryň ýüz öwürmeginiň sebäpleri (Anna witan tarapyndan)

16) Ynam (#WVS)

17) Oksford bagty gözleg

18) Psihologiki abadançylyk

19) Indiki iň tolgundyryjy pursatyňyz nirede?

20) Akyl saglygyňyza seretmek üçin bu hepde näme ederdiňiz?

21) Geçmişim, häzirki ýa-da geljegi barada pikir edýärin

22) Meritokratiýa

23) Emeli intellekt we siwilizasiýanyň soňy

24) Adamlar näme üçin adamlar gijä galýarlar?

25) Özüňe ynam döretmekdäki jyns tapawudy (ifd solnsach)

26) Xing.com medeniýetine baha bermek

27) Patrik Lencioniniň "toparyň bäş sany" -ny "

28) Duýgudaşlyk ...

29) Iş teklibini saýlamagyndaky hünärmenler üçin zerur zat näme?

30) Adamlar näme üçin üýtgemeýärler (Siobhán mchalele)

31) Duýgularyňyzy nädip kadaňyzy düzedip bilersiňiz? (Nawal Musta M.a.)

32) Size baky töleýän 21 başarnyk (Jeremiahermeýa teo / 赵汉昇)

33) Hakyky erkinlik ...

34) Başgalaryna ynam döretmegiň 12 usuly (Jastin Wraýt bilen)

35) Zehinli işgäriň aýratynlyklary (zehinli dolandyryş instituty)

36) Toparyňyzy höweslendirmek üçin 10 açar

37) Wyciencedan algebrasy (Wladimir Lefebvre)

38) Geljegiň üç aýratyn mümkinçiligi (Dr. Klar W. Graves tarapyndan)

39) Sarsmaz özüne ynam döretmek üçin hereketler (Suren Samarhýan tarapyndan)

40)

Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “Fears“. The full version of the results is available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.

Gorkuz

grafiklerBaradaky

VUCA

Korrelýasiýa görnüşi	Çyzykly (Pearson) Çyzykly (Pearson) Çyzykly däl (Naýza)
Korrelýasiýa koeffisiýentiniň möhüm bahasy	Adaty paýlanyş, William Sealyom tarapyndan (talyp) Adaty paýlanyş, William Sealyom tarapyndan (talyp) Adaty däl paýlanma, naýza bilen	Diňe netijeleri görkeziň > r = 0.0301

Paýlamak	Kadaly däl	Kadaly däl	Kadaly däl	Adaty	Adaty	Adaty	Adaty	Adaty
Allhli soraglar Allhli soraglar Iň uly gorkym
Iň uly gorkym
Answer 1	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0498	Gowşak oňyn 0.0248	Gowşak negatiw -0.0246	Gowşak oňyn 0.0980	Gowşak oňyn 0.0357	Gowşak negatiw -0.0120	Gowşak negatiw -0.1507
Answer 2	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0242	Gowşak oňyn 0.0007	Gowşak negatiw -0.0416	Gowşak oňyn 0.0607	Gowşak oňyn 0.0464	Gowşak oňyn 0.0141	Gowşak negatiw -0.0977
Answer 3	-	Gowşak negatiw -1.20E-5	Gowşak oňyn 0.0043	Gowşak negatiw -0.0484	Gowşak negatiw -0.0437	Gowşak oňyn 0.0427	Gowşak oňyn 0.0748	Gowşak negatiw -0.0228
Answer 4	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0458	Gowşak oňyn 0.0313	Gowşak negatiw -0.0284	Gowşak oňyn 0.0174	Gowşak oňyn 0.0370	Gowşak oňyn 0.0217	Gowşak negatiw -0.0996
Answer 5	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0223	Gowşak oňyn 0.1287	Gowşak oňyn 0.0044	Gowşak oňyn 0.0832	Gowşak oňyn 1.84E-5	Gowşak negatiw -0.0125	Gowşak negatiw -0.1817
Answer 6	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0058	Gowşak oňyn 0.0153	Gowşak negatiw -0.0654	Gowşak negatiw -0.0114	Gowşak oňyn 0.0153	Gowşak oňyn 0.0872	Gowşak negatiw -0.0354
Answer 7	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0089	Gowşak oňyn 0.0432	Gowşak negatiw -0.0684	Gowşak negatiw -0.0352	Gowşak oňyn 0.0447	Gowşak oňyn 0.0751	Gowşak negatiw -0.0502
Answer 8	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0624	Gowşak oňyn 0.0845	Gowşak negatiw -0.0302	Gowşak oňyn 0.0111	Gowşak oňyn 0.0349	Gowşak oňyn 0.0173	Gowşak negatiw -0.1351
Answer 9	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0754	Gowşak oňyn 0.1610	Gowşak negatiw -0.0010	Gowşak oňyn 0.0615	Gowşak negatiw -0.0078	Gowşak negatiw -0.0509	Gowşak negatiw -0.1758
Answer 10	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0777	Gowşak oňyn 0.0615	Gowşak negatiw -0.0152	Gowşak oňyn 0.0237	Gowşak oňyn 0.0393	Gowşak negatiw -0.0079	Gowşak negatiw -0.1343
Answer 11	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0679	Gowşak oňyn 0.0557	Gowşak negatiw -0.0085	Gowşak oňyn 0.0088	Gowşak oňyn 0.0247	Gowşak oňyn 0.0186	Gowşak negatiw -0.1251
Answer 12	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0417	Gowşak oňyn 0.1035	Gowşak negatiw -0.0383	Gowşak oňyn 0.0348	Gowşak oňyn 0.0285	Gowşak oňyn 0.0247	Gowşak negatiw -0.1511
Answer 13	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0756	Gowşak oňyn 0.1008	Gowşak negatiw -0.0384	Gowşak oňyn 0.0262	Gowşak oňyn 0.0316	Gowşak oňyn 0.0128	Gowşak negatiw -0.1575
Answer 14	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0825	Gowşak oňyn 0.0921	Gowşak negatiw -0.0078	Gowşak negatiw -0.0144	Gowşak oňyn 0.0039	Gowşak oňyn 0.0092	Gowşak negatiw -0.1128
Answer 15	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0578	Gowşak oňyn 0.1292	Gowşak negatiw -0.0296	Gowşak oňyn 0.0109	Gowşak negatiw -0.0207	Gowşak oňyn 0.0218	Gowşak negatiw -0.1169
Answer 16	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0696	Gowşak oňyn 0.0311	Gowşak negatiw -0.0345	Gowşak negatiw -0.0432	Gowşak oňyn 0.0644	Gowşak oňyn 0.0137	Gowşak negatiw -0.0693

MS Excel eksport

Bu funksiýa, öz VUCA saýlawlaryňyzda elýeterli bolar

Bolýar

You can not only just create your poll in the tarif «V.U.C.A anket dizaýner» (with a unique link and your logo) but also you can earn money by selling its results in the tarif «Saýlaw dükany», as already the authors of polls.

If you participated in VUCA polls, you can see your results and compare them with the overall polls results, which are constantly growing, in your personal account after purchasing tarif «Meniň SDT»

[1] https://twitter.com/wileyprof

[2] https://colinallen.dnsalias.org

[3] https://philpeople.org/profiles/colin-allen

2023.10.13

FearpersonqualitiesprojectorganizationalstructureRACIresponsibilitymatrixCritical ChainProject Managementfocus factorJiraempathyleadersbossGermanyChinaPolicyUkraineRussiawarvolatilityuncertaintycomplexityambiguityVUCArelocatejobproblemcountryreasongive upobjectivekeyresultmathematicalpsychologyMBTIHR metricsstandardDEIcorrelationriskscoringmodelGame TheoryPrisoner's Dilemma

Waleri Kosenko

Önümiň eýesi SaaS SDTEST®

Waleriý 1993-nji ýylda sosial pedagog-psiholog hökmünde saýlandy we şondan soň bilimini taslamany dolandyrmakda ulandy.
Waleri 2013-nji ýylda magistr derejesini we taslama we programma menejeri derejesini aldy. Magistr programmasynyň dowamynda Taslamanyň mol kartasy (GPM Doýçe Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) we Spiral Dynamics bilen tanyşdy.
Waleriý V.U.C.A.-nyň näbelliligini öwrenmegiň awtory. Psihologiýada Spiral Dynamics we matematiki statistika we 38 halkara pikir soralyşygy ulanmak düşünjesi.

Bu ýazgy bar 0 Teswirler

Jogap bermek

Jogapy ýatyryň

Teswiriňizi goýuň