Mathematical Psychology

This project investigates mathematical psychology's historical and philosophical foundations to clarify its distinguishing characteristics and relationships to adjacent fields. Through gathering primary sources, histories, and interviews with researchers, author Prof. Colin Allen - University of Pittsburgh [1, 2, 3] and his students Osman Attah, Brendan Fleig-Goldstein, Mara McGuire, and Dzintra Ullis have identified three central questions:

What makes the use of mathematics in mathematical psychology reasonably effective, in contrast to other sciences like physics-inspired mathematical biology or symbolic cognitive science?
How does the mathematical approach in mathematical psychology differ from other branches of psychology, like psychophysics and psychometrics?
What is the appropriate relationship of mathematical psychology to cognitive science, given diverging perspectives on aligning with this field?

Preliminary findings emphasize data-driven modeling, skepticism of cognitive science alignments, and early reliance on computation. They will further probe the interplay with cognitive neuroscience and contrast rational-analysis approaches. By elucidating the motivating perspectives and objectives of different eras in mathematical psychology's development, they aim to understand its past and inform constructive dialogue on its philosophical foundations and future directions. This project intends to provide a conceptual roadmap for the field through integrated history and philosophy of science.

The Project: Integrating History and Philosophy of Mathematical Psychology

This project aims to integrate historical and philosophical perspectives to elucidate the foundations of mathematical psychology. As Norwood Hanson stated, history without philosophy is blind, while philosophy without history is empty. The goal is to find a middle ground between the contextual focus of history and the conceptual focus of philosophy.

The team acknowledges that all historical accounts are imperfect, but some can provide valuable insights. The history of mathematical psychology is difficult to tell without centering on the influential Stanford group. Tracing academic lineages and key events includes part of the picture, but more context is needed to fully understand the field's development.

The project draws on diverse sources, including research interviews, retrospective articles, formal histories, and online materials. More interviews and research will further flesh out the historical and philosophical foundations. While incomplete, the current analysis aims to identify important themes, contrasts, and questions that shaped mathematical psychology's evolution. Ultimately, the goal is an integrated historical and conceptual roadmap to inform contemporary perspectives on the field's identity and future directions.

The Rise of Mathematical Psychology

The history of efforts to mathematize psychology traces back to the quantitative imperative stemming from the Galilean scientific revolution. This imprinted the notion that proper science requires mathematics, leading to "physics envy" in other disciplines like psychology.

Many early psychologists argued psychology needed to become mathematical to be scientific. However, mathematizing psychology faced complications absent in the physical sciences. Objects in psychology were not readily present as quantifiable, provoking heated debates on whether psychometric and psychophysical measurements were meaningful.

Nonetheless, the desire to develop mathematical psychology persisted. Different approaches grappled with determining the appropriate role of mathematics in relation to psychological experiments and data. For example, Herbart favored starting with mathematics to ensure accuracy, while Fechner insisted experiments must come first to ground mathematics.

Tensions remain between data-driven versus theory-driven mathematization of psychology. Contemporary perspectives range from psychometric and psychophysical stances that foreground data to measurement-theoretical and computational approaches that emphasize formal models.

Elucidating how psychologists negotiated to apply mathematical methods to an apparently resistant subject matter helps reveal the evolving role and place of mathematics in psychology. This historical interplay shaped the emergence of mathematical psychology as a field.

The Distinctive Mathematical Approach of Mathematical Psychology

What sets mathematical psychology apart from other branches of psychology in its use of mathematics?

Several key aspects stand out:

Advocating quantitative methods broadly. Mathematical psychology emerged partly to push psychology to embrace quantitative modeling and mathematics beyond basic statistics.
Drawing from diverse mathematical tools. With greater training in mathematics, mathematical psychologists utilize more advanced and varied mathematical techniques like topology and differential geometry.
Linking models and experiments. Mathematical psychologists emphasize tightly connecting experimental design and statistical analysis, with experiments created to test specific models.
Favoring theoretical models. Mathematical psychology incorporates "pure" mathematical results and prefers analytic, hand-fitted models over data-driven computer models.
Seeking general, cumulative theory. Unlike just describing data, mathematical psychology aspires to abstract, general theory supported across experiments, cumulative progress in models, and mathematical insight into psychological mechanisms.

So while not unique to mathematical psychology, these key elements help characterize how its use of mathematics diverges from adjacent fields like psychophysics and psychometrics. Mathematical psychology carved out an identity embracing quantitative methods but also theoretical depth and broad generalization.

Situating Mathematical Psychology Relative to Cognitive Science

What is the appropriate perspective on mathematical psychology's relationship to cognitive psychology and cognitive science? While connected historically and conceptually, essential distinctions exist.

Mathematical psychology draws from diverse disciplines that are also influential in cognitive science, like computer science, psychology, linguistics, and neuroscience. However, mathematical psychology appears more skeptical of alignments with cognitive science.

For example, cognitive science prominently adopted the computer as a model of the human mind, while mathematical psychology focused more narrowly on computers as modeling tools.

Additionally, mathematical psychology seems to take a more critical stance towards purely simulation-based modeling in cognitive science, instead emphasizing iterative modeling tightly linked to experimentation.

Overall, mathematical psychology exhibits significant overlap with cognitive science but strongly asserts its distinct mathematical orientation and modeling perspectives. Elucidating this complex relationship remains an ongoing project, but preliminary analysis suggests mathematical psychology intentionally diverged from cognitive science in its formative development.

This establishes mathematical psychology's separate identity while retaining connections to adjacent disciplines at the intersection of mathematics, psychology, and computation.

Looking Ahead: Open Questions and Future Research

This historical and conceptual analysis of mathematical psychology's foundations has illuminated key themes, contrasts, and questions that shaped the field's development. Further research can build on these preliminary findings.

Additional work is needed to flesh out the fuller intellectual, social, and political context driving the evolution of mathematical psychology. Examining the influences and reactions of key figures will provide a richer picture.

Ongoing investigation can probe whether the identified tensions and contrasts represent historical artifacts or still animate contemporary debates. Do mathematical psychologists today grapple with similar questions on the role of mathematics and modeling?

Further analysis should also elucidate the nature of the purported bidirectional relationship between modeling and experimentation in mathematical psychology. As well, clarifying the diversity of perspectives on goals like generality, abstraction, and cumulative theory-building would be valuable.

Finally, this research aims to spur discussion on philosophical issues such as realism, pluralism, and progress in mathematical psychology models. Is the accuracy and truth value of models an important consideration or mainly beside the point? And where is the field headed - towards greater verisimilitude or an indefinite balancing of complexity and abstraction?

By spurring reflection on this conceptual foundation, this historical and integrative analysis hopes to provide a roadmap to inform constructive dialogue on mathematical psychology's identity and future trajectory.

The SDTEST^®

The SDTEST^® is a simple and fun tool to uncover our unique motivational values that use mathematical psychology of varying complexity.

The SDTEST^® helps us better understand ourselves and others on this lifelong path of self-discovery.

Here are reports of polls which SDTEST^® makes:

1) Soňky aýda işgärler bilen baglanyşykly kompaniýalaryň hereketleri (hawa / ýok)

2) Soňky aýda işgärler bilen baglanyşykly kompaniýalaryň hereketleri (% -de fakt)

3) Gorkuz

4) Meniň ýurduma ýüzbe-ýüz bolýan iň uly meseleler

5) Üstünlikli toparlary guranyňyzda haýsy häsiýetleri we başarnyklary ulanýarlar?

6) Google. Toparyň netijeliligine täsir edýän faktorlar

7) Iş gözleýänleriň esasy ileri tutulýan ugurlary

8) Bosbiýa uly lider näme edýär?

9) Adamlary işde üstünlik gazanýan näme edýär?

10) Uzakdan işlemek üçin az aýlyk almaga taýynmy?

11) Ageaşizm barmy?

12) Karýeradaky ýaşizm

13) Durmuşda ýaşizm

14) Ageaşylygyň sebäpleri

15) Adamlaryň ýüz öwürmeginiň sebäpleri (Anna witan tarapyndan)

16) Ynam (#WVS)

17) Oksford bagty gözleg

18) Psihologiki abadançylyk

19) Indiki iň tolgundyryjy pursatyňyz nirede?

20) Akyl saglygyňyza seretmek üçin bu hepde näme ederdiňiz?

21) Geçmişim, häzirki ýa-da geljegi barada pikir edýärin

22) Meritokratiýa

23) Emeli intellekt we siwilizasiýanyň soňy

24) Adamlar näme üçin adamlar gijä galýarlar?

25) Özüňe ynam döretmekdäki jyns tapawudy (ifd solnsach)

26) Xing.com medeniýetine baha bermek

27) Patrik Lencioniniň "toparyň bäş sany" -ny "

28) Duýgudaşlyk ...

29) Iş teklibini saýlamagyndaky hünärmenler üçin zerur zat näme?

30) Adamlar näme üçin üýtgemeýärler (Siobhán mchalele)

31) Duýgularyňyzy nädip kadaňyzy düzedip bilersiňiz? (Nawal Musta M.a.)

32) Size baky töleýän 21 başarnyk (Jeremiahermeýa teo / 赵汉昇)

33) Hakyky erkinlik ...

34) Başgalaryna ynam döretmegiň 12 usuly (Jastin Wraýt bilen)

35) Zehinli işgäriň aýratynlyklary (zehinli dolandyryş instituty)

36) Toparyňyzy höweslendirmek üçin 10 açar

37) Wyciencedan algebrasy (Wladimir Lefebvre)

38) Geljegiň üç aýratyn mümkinçiligi (Dr. Klar W. Graves tarapyndan)

39) Sarsmaz özüne ynam döretmek üçin hereketler (Suren Samarhýan tarapyndan)

40)

Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “Fears“. The full version of the results is available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.

Gorkuz

grafiklerBaradaky

VUCA

Korrelýasiýa görnüşi	Çyzykly (Pearson) Çyzykly (Pearson) Çyzykly däl (Naýza)
Korrelýasiýa koeffisiýentiniň möhüm bahasy	Adaty paýlanyş, William Sealyom tarapyndan (talyp) Adaty paýlanyş, William Sealyom tarapyndan (talyp) Adaty däl paýlanma, naýza bilen	Diňe netijeleri görkeziň > r = 0.0308

Paýlamak	Kadaly däl	Kadaly däl	Kadaly däl	Adaty	Adaty	Adaty	Adaty	Adaty
Allhli soraglar Allhli soraglar Iň uly gorkym
Iň uly gorkym
Answer 1	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0512	Gowşak oňyn 0.0254	Gowşak negatiw -0.0233	Gowşak oňyn 0.0989	Gowşak oňyn 0.0408	Gowşak negatiw -0.0127	Gowşak negatiw -0.1587
Answer 2	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0184	Gowşak negatiw -0.0046	Gowşak negatiw -0.0422	Gowşak oňyn 0.0619	Gowşak oňyn 0.0511	Gowşak oňyn 0.0132	Gowşak negatiw -0.0950
Answer 3	-	Gowşak negatiw -0.0030	Gowşak negatiw -0.0023	Gowşak negatiw -0.0466	Gowşak negatiw -0.0399	Gowşak oňyn 0.0480	Gowşak oňyn 0.0744	Gowşak negatiw -0.0258
Answer 4	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0451	Gowşak oňyn 0.0355	Gowşak negatiw -0.0271	Gowşak oňyn 0.0160	Gowşak oňyn 0.0403	Gowşak oňyn 0.0212	Gowşak negatiw -0.1041
Answer 5	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0235	Gowşak oňyn 0.1265	Gowşak oňyn 0.0079	Gowşak oňyn 0.0781	Gowşak negatiw -0.0001	Gowşak negatiw -0.0153	Gowşak negatiw -0.1754
Answer 6	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0023	Gowşak oňyn 0.0097	Gowşak negatiw -0.0625	Gowşak negatiw -0.0098	Gowşak oňyn 0.0202	Gowşak oňyn 0.0862	Gowşak negatiw -0.0366
Answer 7	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0084	Gowşak oňyn 0.0357	Gowşak negatiw -0.0659	Gowşak negatiw -0.0302	Gowşak oňyn 0.0504	Gowşak oňyn 0.0702	Gowşak negatiw -0.0522
Answer 8	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0649	Gowşak oňyn 0.0748	Gowşak negatiw -0.0280	Gowşak oňyn 0.0104	Gowşak oňyn 0.0417	Gowşak oňyn 0.0155	Gowşak negatiw -0.1351
Answer 9	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0756	Gowşak oňyn 0.1618	Gowşak oňyn 0.0036	Gowşak oňyn 0.0619	Gowşak negatiw -0.0057	Gowşak negatiw -0.0514	Gowşak negatiw -0.1807
Answer 10	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0789	Gowşak oňyn 0.0607	Gowşak negatiw -0.0168	Gowşak oňyn 0.0242	Gowşak oňyn 0.0384	Gowşak negatiw -0.0078	Gowşak negatiw -0.1323
Answer 11	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0612	Gowşak oňyn 0.0543	Gowşak negatiw -0.0109	Gowşak oňyn 0.0118	Gowşak oňyn 0.0293	Gowşak oňyn 0.0215	Gowşak negatiw -0.1269
Answer 12	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0398	Gowşak oňyn 0.0956	Gowşak negatiw -0.0330	Gowşak oňyn 0.0352	Gowşak oňyn 0.0302	Gowşak oňyn 0.0251	Gowşak negatiw -0.1505
Answer 13	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0706	Gowşak oňyn 0.0959	Gowşak negatiw -0.0381	Gowşak oňyn 0.0278	Gowşak oňyn 0.0396	Gowşak oňyn 0.0130	Gowşak negatiw -0.1592
Answer 14	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0868	Gowşak oňyn 0.0903	Gowşak negatiw -0.0041	Gowşak negatiw -0.0155	Gowşak oňyn 0.0052	Gowşak oňyn 0.0107	Gowşak negatiw -0.1175
Answer 15	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0573	Gowşak oňyn 0.1224	Gowşak negatiw -0.0341	Gowşak oňyn 0.0129	Gowşak negatiw -0.0158	Gowşak oňyn 0.0270	Gowşak negatiw -0.1170
Answer 16	-	Gowşak oňyn 0.0708	Gowşak oňyn 0.0242	Gowşak negatiw -0.0388	Gowşak negatiw -0.0406	Gowşak oňyn 0.0723	Gowşak oňyn 0.0176	Gowşak negatiw -0.0738

MS Excel eksport

Bu funksiýa, öz VUCA saýlawlaryňyzda elýeterli bolar

Bolýar

You can not only just create your poll in the tarif «V.U.C.A anket dizaýner» (with a unique link and your logo) but also you can earn money by selling its results in the tarif «Saýlaw dükany», as already the authors of polls.

If you participated in VUCA polls, you can see your results and compare them with the overall polls results, which are constantly growing, in your personal account after purchasing tarif «Meniň SDT»

[1] https://twitter.com/wileyprof

[2] https://colinallen.dnsalias.org

[3] https://philpeople.org/profiles/colin-allen

2023.10.13

FearpersonqualitiesprojectorganizationalstructureRACIresponsibilitymatrixCritical ChainProject Managementfocus factorJiraempathyleadersbossGermanyChinaPolicyUkraineRussiawarvolatilityuncertaintycomplexityambiguityVUCArelocatejobproblemcountryreasongive upobjectivekeyresultmathematicalpsychologyMBTIHR metricsstandardDEIcorrelationriskscoringmodelGame TheoryPrisoner's Dilemma

Waleri Kosenko

Önümiň eýesi SaaS SDTEST®

Waleriý 1993-nji ýylda sosial pedagog-psiholog hökmünde saýlandy we şondan soň bilimini taslamany dolandyrmakda ulandy.
Waleri 2013-nji ýylda magistr derejesini we taslama we programma menejeri derejesini aldy. Magistr programmasynyň dowamynda Taslamanyň mol kartasy (GPM Doýçe Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) we Spiral Dynamics bilen tanyşdy.
Waleriý V.U.C.A.-nyň näbelliligini öwrenmegiň awtory. Psihologiýada Spiral Dynamics we matematiki statistika we 38 halkara pikir soralyşygy ulanmak düşünjesi.

Bu ýazgy bar 0 Teswirler

Jogap bermek

Jogapy ýatyryň

Teswiriňizi goýuň