AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

There once was an AI named Chat who was really good at repeating back information it already knew. One day, Chat was given to some office workers [1] to help them with their jobs. Some of the workers were experts at their jobs, while others were still learning.  


At first, Chat helped all the workers get more work done faster - even the experts! But soon, the experts noticed something funny. The workers who were still learning got way MORE help from Chat. The new workers improved a lot using Chat, doing their work faster and better than ever before!   


The experts wondered why Chat didn't help them as much. That's when they realized - that Chat is an expert at repeating back facts but can't come up with brand new ideas. So, for workers who already knew those facts, Chat didn't offer them that much new help. But for newer workers still learning those basics, Chat was able to teach them so much more!


This shows a correlation - as in, two things that relate to each other and change together. The more expert a worker already was, the less helpful Chat was for them. But for newer workers, Chat could help them almost as much as the experts! It's because of their different starting points. Chat has a limit to how expert it can be. So, the closer a worker already was to Chat's expertise, the less new stuff Chat offered them.


The experts and newbies improved at different rates thanks to Chat. Their own expertise compared to Chat's matters for how much more they can learn. That connection in how much they improve is the correlation!


The SDTEST® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.


Imagine also giving an "A.I. and the end of civilization" poll. It asks people to rate at the agree or disagree level. 


Now imagine 100 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST® colors with their rated answers about the danger of AI.


Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!


Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the danger of AI. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.


Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “A.I. and the end of civilization“. The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Dirbtinis intelektas ir civilizacijos pabaiga

Šalis
kalba
-
Mail
Perskaičiuoti
Kritinė reikšmė koreliacijos koeficientas
Normalus platinimas, pateikė William Sealy Gosset (studentas) r = 0.0846
Normalus platinimas, pateikė William Sealy Gosset (studentas) r = 0.0846
Ne normalus pasiskirstymas, autorius Spearman r = 0.0037
PaskirstymasNe
normalu
NormalusNormalusNormalusNormalusNormalusNormalusNormalus
Visi klausimai
Visi klausimai
1) Saugumas (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
2) Kontrolė (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
1) Saugumas (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
Answer 1-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0570
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0377
Silpnas teigiamas
0.1017
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.1119
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0292
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0507
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0269
Answer 2-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0374
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0229
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0456
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0045
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0068
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0070
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0697
Answer 2-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0192
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0343
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0021
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0597
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0124
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0068
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0126
Answer 3-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0115
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0310
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0224
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0166
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0600
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0258
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0488
Answer 4-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0209
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0161
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0244
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0113
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0113
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0306
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0414
Answer 4-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0462
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0515
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0994
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0833
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0152
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0467
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0169
Answer 5-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0516
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0780
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0446
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0453
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0181
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0138
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0386
2) Kontrolė (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
Answer 6-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0157
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0320
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0753
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0752
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0109
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.1067
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0702
Answer 7-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0203
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0441
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0353
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0010
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0823
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0173
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0131
Answer 7-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0554
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0259
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0192
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0221
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0365
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0248
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0335
Answer 8-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0219
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0052
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0038
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0402
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0002
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0141
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0318
Answer 9-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0506
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0363
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0292
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0542
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0687
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0413
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0523
Answer 9-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.1082
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0387
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0090
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0258
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0102
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0896
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0111
Answer 10-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0027
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0573
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0550
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.1102
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0135
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0416
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0747


Eksportas į MS Excel
Ši funkcija bus prieinama jūsų VUCA apklausose
Gerai



[1] https://www.ft.com/content/b2928076-5c52-43e9-8872-08fda2aa2fcf


2023.11.27
Valerii Kosenko
Produkto savininkas „Saa Pet Project SDTest®“

1993 m. Valerii buvo kvalifikuotas kaip socialinis pedagogo-psichologas ir nuo to laiko pritaikė savo žinias projektų valdyme.
2013 m. Valerii įgijo magistro laipsnį ir projekto bei programų vadovo kvalifikaciją. Vykdydamas magistro programą, jis susipažino su projekto planu (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Projektmanagement e. V.) ir „Spiral Dynamics“.
Valerii ėmėsi įvairių „Spiral Dynamics“ testų ir panaudojo savo žinias bei patirtį, kad pritaikytų dabartinę SDTEST versiją.
Valerii yra autorius tyrinėti V.U.C.A. Koncepcija naudojant spiralinę dinamiką ir matematinę statistiką psichologijoje, daugiau nei 20 tarptautinių apklausų.
Šis įrašas turi 0 Komentarai
Atsakinėti į
Atšaukti atsakymą
Palikite savo komentarą
×
Rasite klaidą
SIŪLYTI SAVO Teisingas versija
Įveskite savo e-mail kaip norim
Siųsti
atšaukti
Bot
sdtest
1
Sveiki! Leiskite paklausti tavęs, ar jūs jau susipažinote su spiralės dinamika?