AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

There once was an AI named Chat who was really good at repeating back information it already knew. One day, Chat was given to some office workers [1] to help them with their jobs. Some of the workers were experts at their jobs, while others were still learning.  


At first, Chat helped all the workers get more work done faster - even the experts! But soon, the experts noticed something funny. The workers who were still learning got way MORE help from Chat. The new workers improved a lot using Chat, doing their work faster and better than ever before!   


The experts wondered why Chat didn't help them as much. That's when they realized - that Chat is an expert at repeating back facts but can't come up with brand new ideas. So, for workers who already knew those facts, Chat didn't offer them that much new help. But for newer workers still learning those basics, Chat was able to teach them so much more!


This shows a correlation - as in, two things that relate to each other and change together. The more expert a worker already was, the less helpful Chat was for them. But for newer workers, Chat could help them almost as much as the experts! It's because of their different starting points. Chat has a limit to how expert it can be. So, the closer a worker already was to Chat's expertise, the less new stuff Chat offered them.


The experts and newbies improved at different rates thanks to Chat. Their own expertise compared to Chat's matters for how much more they can learn. That connection in how much they improve is the correlation!


The SDTEST® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.


Imagine also giving an "A.I. and the end of civilization" poll. It asks people to rate at the agree or disagree level. 


Now imagine 100 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST® colors with their rated answers about the danger of AI.


Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!


Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the danger of AI. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.


Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “A.I. and the end of civilization“. The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Dirbtinis intelektas ir civilizacijos pabaiga

Šalis
kalba
-
Mail
Perskaičiuoti
Kritinė reikšmė koreliacijos koeficientas
Normalus platinimas, pateikė William Sealy Gosset (studentas) r = 0.0738
Normalus platinimas, pateikė William Sealy Gosset (studentas) r = 0.0738
Ne normalus pasiskirstymas, autorius Spearman r = 0.003
PaskirstymasNe
normalu
NormalusNe
normalu
NormalusNormalusNormalusNormalusNormalus
Visi klausimai
Visi klausimai
1) Saugumas (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
2) Kontrolė (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
1) Saugumas (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
Answer 1-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0665
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0199
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0974
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.1165
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0082
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0475
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0169
Answer 2-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0223
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0030
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0416
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0233
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0524
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0085
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0679
Answer 2-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0239
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0307
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0012
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0521
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0192
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0046
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0093
Answer 3-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0286
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0104
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0071
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0331
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0376
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0135
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0592
Answer 4-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0042
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0183
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0107
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0474
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0180
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0299
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0574
Answer 4-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0219
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0546
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0725
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0718
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0110
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0471
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0135
Answer 5-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0598
Silpnas teigiamas
0.1017
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0598
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0076
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0021
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0008
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0260
2) Kontrolė (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
Answer 6-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0230
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0123
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0764
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0520
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0236
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0710
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0567
Answer 7-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0172
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0284
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0452
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0298
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0926
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0209
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0460
Answer 7-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0042
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0385
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0527
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0063
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0020
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0584
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0263
Answer 8-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0213
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0009
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0154
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0573
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0159
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0140
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0526
Answer 9-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0047
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0302
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0598
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0340
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0746
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0113
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0396
Answer 9-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0905
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0406
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0079
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0019
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0113
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0741
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0134
Answer 10-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0017
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0875
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0295
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0716
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0326
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0085
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0707


Eksportas į MS Excel
Ši funkcija bus prieinama jūsų VUCA apklausose
Gerai



[1] https://www.ft.com/content/b2928076-5c52-43e9-8872-08fda2aa2fcf


2023.11.27
Valerii Kosenko
Produkto savininkas SaaS SDTEST®

1993 metais Valerii įgijo socialinio pedagogo-psichologo kvalifikaciją ir nuo tada savo žinias pritaikė projektų valdyme.
2013 m. Valerii įgijo magistro laipsnį ir projektų bei programų vadovo kvalifikaciją. Magistrantūros studijų metu susipažino su Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) ir Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii yra V.U.C.A. netikrumo tyrinėjimo autorius. koncepcija, naudojant spiralinę dinamiką ir matematinę statistiką psichologijoje, ir 38 tarptautinės apklausos.
Šis įrašas turi 0 Komentarai
Atsakinėti į
Atšaukti atsakymą
Palikite savo komentarą
×
Rasite klaidą
SIŪLYTI SAVO Teisingas versija
Įveskite savo e-mail kaip norim
Siųsti
atšaukti
Bot
sdtest
1
Sveiki! Leiskite paklausti tavęs, ar jūs jau susipažinote su spiralės dinamika?